|
The examination and admission process shall be completed within a period of four weeks thereafter".
The judges were passing orders on a writ petition filed by Bagyaraj of Pudukuppam, who said abolition of the CET and introduction of a normalisation scheme for law admissions could not be prudent method of admissions.
In the order, the First Bench said the Government was unable to give any valid reason for discontinuing the CET, "A student with any degree can apply for law courses, and therefore, normalisation scheme is not possible. Since the candidates, who are eligible for joining B.L. courses are from various disciplines, the CET is necessary to achieve uniform evaluation before selecting candidates for admissions".
The Bench also concluded, "In our opinion, the decision to abolish the CET is wholly arbitrary and violative of Article 14 (Right to Equality) of the Constitution."
|